\n\t\t\t\tRateMyD is an AI photo-rating tool. It scores a submitted photo from 0–10 across six\n\t\t\t\tdimensions — proportions, aesthetics, grooming, photo quality, lighting, and overall vibe — in\n\t\t\t\teither a brutally honest \"roast\" mode or an encouraging \"hype\" mode. It is built for\n\t\t\t\tentertainment and curiosity, not diagnosis.\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tEach photo is analysed by an AI model that returns a score and written feedback for all six\n\t\t\t\tdimensions, plus an overall verdict. The aggregate of these scores across all submissions is\n\t\t\t\tpublished, updated daily, on our\n\t\t\t\tAI rating stats page. Those\n\t\t\t\tnumbers describe what gets uploaded to a rating app — they are self-selected, not a\n\t\t\t\trepresentative sample of any population.\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tOur size statistics and\n\t\t\t\tpercentile calculator\n\t\t\t\tare grounded in the most-cited peer-reviewed source on this topic:\n\t\t\t\t{BJU_2015.source.citation} — a systematic review and meta-analysis of\n\t\t\t\t{BJU_2015.source.sampleSize.toLocaleString()} men using standardised, clinician-measured\n\t\t\t\tprotocols (self-reported data was excluded from the nomograms). The full study is available at\n\t\t\t\t{BJU_2015.source.url}. Percentiles are computed with a standard normal distribution model using the mean and\n\t\t\t\tstandard deviation reported in that study.\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tWe deliberately keep this clinical size data separate from our own AI-rating scores: one is\n\t\t\t\tpeer-reviewed physical measurement, the other is an aesthetic AI judgement. We don't blend the\n\t\t\t\ttwo, and we don't publish country-by-country \"averages\" we can't source — between-country\n\t\t\t\tdifferences in the literature are small and methodologically inconsistent, so we cite regional\n\t\t\t\tstudies only where a peer-reviewed one exists.\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tPhotos are deleted immediately after the AI processes them. We don't store them, we don't use\n\t\t\t\tthem to train models, and no human reviews them. The numbers on our stats pages are aggregates\n\t\t\t\tonly — they never expose any individual submission. See the\n\t\t\t\tprivacy policy for the full detail.\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tOur educational content is written and maintained by the RateMyD editorial team and checked\n\t\t\t\tagainst the peer-reviewed sources cited on each page. If you spot an error, tell us on the\n\t\t\t\tfeedback board or in our community\n\t\t\t\tat\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\tNot medical advice. RateMyD is for education and\n\t\t\t\t\tentertainment. Individual variation is normal and healthy. If you have a medical concern,\n\t\t\t\t\tconsult a qualified healthcare provider. Strictly 18+.\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t