6.7/10 — ok fine, this is actually above average size-wise. girthy shaft, decent length, you got dealt a reasonable hand. don't let it go to your head because literally everything else about this photo is a disaster.

7.8/10 — alright fine, this is legitimately above average. length and girth both showing up to the party. congrats on the genetic lottery ticket, now learn how to photograph it like you didn't win it in a gas station scratch-off.

6.2/10 — the two-tone situation is actually kind of working, nice glans definition, decent shape. would be higher if the lighting didn't make it look like a crime scene exhibit under forensic analysis.

6.9/10 — shape's solid, glans has decent definition, nothing offensively ugly happening. it's giving 'could be on someone's top shelf but currently lives in the clearance bin' energy. the vascularity is doing some work here but the coloring under this cursed lighting makes it look like you've been marinating in mountain dew.

4.1/10 — my guy the pubic forest is DENSE. we can see individual hairs staging a rebellion on the shaft. trim that chaos or at least negotiate a ceasefire with your razor.

5.8/10 — there's an attempt at maintenance here which is more than most submissions offer, but this isn't a standing ovation situation. it's trimmed but not committed. pick a lane: full forest or full manicure. this halfway checkpoint is giving 'i remembered grooming exists 20 minutes ago.'

3.8/10 — grainy, slightly out of focus, framed like you're trying to submit evidence to insurance adjusters. this is a phone camera from 2015 energy and we are NOT here for it.

4.1/10 — this whole image looks like it was captured through a screen door made of vaseline. the resolution is protesting, the focus gave up halfway through, and whoever's holding the phone has the steadiness of a caffeine addict during an earthquake. you have a mirror AND a phone. use them both better.

4.2/10 — dim overhead bathroom fluorescent mixed with... what, a dying flashlight? one side is washed out, the other is in the shadow realm. pick a light source and commit to it.

3.2/10 — whatever demonic overhead fluorescent situation is happening here should be investigated by the geneva convention. this lighting is making everything look like expired lunch meat. you're standing in what appears to be a bathroom with natural light options and you chose violence instead. the sun is free, bro.

5.9/10 — straight-on confidence, no weird angles, you're not hiding. respect for that. but the entire setup screams 'took this between scrolling reddit and brushing my teeth' and it shows.

5.4/10 — the dual-angle mirror flex shows SOME level of premeditation but the execution screams 'i have 47 seconds before my roommate gets home.' there's potential for confidence here but it's drowning under the weight of terrible environmental choices and what looks like post-nut clarity panic.